Zinstall vs laplink
![zinstall vs laplink zinstall vs laplink](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/service_logos/33/78d699f14c93/large.png)
Users can copy over their data when they are ready (it is a simple cut, or copy, and paste from XP to Windows 7). Using Group Policy, you can move over those XP apps that run under Windows 7 and leave in the XP channel the ones that aren't. Users get a brand-new Windows 7 system (which folks love like the smell of a new car) but with the crutch of their XP systems virtually running all their comfort-zone apps, files, and so forth. The two channels keep Windows 7 clean from potential harm from the old system's files and components that might otherwise cause system instability. Applications, files, background settings, and so on are all pulled into this alternate "channel" to which you can switch back and forth with an icon in the system tray. The entire system is transferred to the new one. Zinstall will then create a virtual XP on the Windows 7 system that mimics your old XP to the letter.
ZINSTALL VS LAPLINK UPGRADE
The idea is simple: If your system can be upgraded to Windows 7, do the installation and let the upgrader create the Windows.old file (which is what happens when you try to upgrade XP to Windows 7).
![zinstall vs laplink zinstall vs laplink](https://i1.wp.com/topcracked.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Laplink-Pcmover-logo.png)
Zinstall XP7: The coexistence migrator This one really intrigued me. With those caveats, here are non-Microsoft tools to consider in your Windows 7 migration that may be easier than Microsoft's options. These are just a few tools and solutions that are worth investigating, and by no means an exhaustive list. I'm not endorsing one option over another here, as this isn't a side-by-side product comparison. What is the application support (or lack thereof) between XP and Windows 7?.